What Supervisors Really Expect in a Research Proposal (But Rarely Say Clearly)

Outline:

  1. Intro: unspoken expectations
    • Students feel lost; feedback is “make it stronger” but not specific.
    • Aim: decode the usual expectations for a strong proposal.
  2. Element 1 – A focused, justified problem statement
    • Show how to go from a broad issue to a sharp problem.
    • Importance of context and citing a few key sources.
  3. Element 2 – Clear objectives and research questions
    • Distinguish between overall objective and specific questions/hypotheses.
    • Examples in business/trade.
  4. Element 3 – Coherent proposed methodology
    • Design, population, sampling, instruments, and basic analysis plan.
    • Supervisors look for feasibility and internal consistency.
  5. Element 4 – Contribution and feasibility
    • Why the study matters (theoretical, practical, regional).
    • Timeframe, resources, and ethical considerations.
  6. Element 5 – Professional presentation
    • Structure, referencing, language quality.
    • How a neat, well‑organized proposal builds trust.

Soft pitch: SATC proposal‑building help

Describe how the training supports participants in designing and writing strong, supervisor‑ready proposals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *